Loading...
Printed on 7/21/2026
For informational purposes only. This is not medical advice.
FRAIL-NH is a frailty scoring framework adapted for nursing-home and institutional long-term-care populations. It draws on functional dependency and clinical vulnerability items to estimate frailty burden and support risk stratification and care planning.
Formula: FRAIL-NH is represented as a summed frailty-burden score; higher totals indicate greater frailty burden.
Save your results with a free account
Keep a history of calculations, favorite tools, and access your dashboard anytime.
Evaluate the resident across the instrument's core domains: functional dependence in activities of daily living, mobility and ambulation ability, nutritional status and weight loss, cognitive status, and additional clinical vulnerability items calibrated for the nursing home setting. Each domain is rated according to the specified item criteria, with higher scores reflecting greater impairment or vulnerability in that domain.
Add the scores across all domains to obtain the FRAIL-NH total (0–14). Unlike the community FRAIL-Scale (0–5), the FRAIL-NH captures a wider range of frailty burden appropriate for the institutionalized population, where most residents have baseline functional dependencies that would score high on community-based tools, obscuring meaningful differentiation.
Interpret the total score in the context of institutional care planning: low scores (0–3) suggest minimal frailty burden and suitability for active rehabilitation goals; moderate scores (4–7) indicate intermediate frailty warranting a multidisciplinary care plan review, targeted nutritional and mobility support, and advance care planning preparation; high scores (8–14) indicate severe frailty, supporting palliative-oriented care goals, frequent reassessment, and family communication about prognosis and realistic expectations.
Admitting physicians, geriatric nurses, care coordinators
Every nursing home admission deserves a structured frailty assessment within the first 72 hours to establish a baseline, set appropriate rehabilitation goals, inform staffing intensity requirements, and initiate an individualized care plan. FRAIL-NH provides a validated, institutionally calibrated starting point that distinguishes the newly admitted resident who is highly frail from the one who retains meaningful functional reserve. Comparing FRAIL-NH at admission with scores at 3 and 6 months documents whether the resident is stabilizing, improving with targeted interventions, or progressing toward greater frailty—information that drives care transitions and funding decisions.
Nursing home physicians, director of nursing, multidisciplinary team
Long-term care regulations in many jurisdictions require periodic reassessment of residents' functional and clinical status. FRAIL-NH provides a structured, reproducible frailty metric that complements mandated assessments (such as the MDS in the U.S.) by quantifying frailty burden in a single score that communicates risk tier across the care team. Serial FRAIL-NH scores create a longitudinal frailty trajectory that identifies residents experiencing accelerated decline, enabling proactive intervention before a crisis—hospital transfer or acute deterioration—occurs.
Palliative care teams, attending physicians, social workers, chaplains
High FRAIL-NH scores (8–14) identify residents with severe frailty for whom curative or life-prolonging goals may be inconsistent with prognosis and quality of life. These residents and their families benefit from an advance care planning conversation that uses the FRAIL-NH score as an objective prognostic anchor. Families often find it easier to engage with end-of-life planning when presented with a structured, validated severity score alongside clinical narrative, rather than physician judgment alone. FRAIL-NH scores also support documentation for palliative care eligibility and hospice enrollment criteria.
Proceduralists, hospitalists, geriatric liaison teams
Nursing home residents occasionally require procedures—catheter insertions, minor surgeries, emergency interventions. FRAIL-NH provides a quick frailty severity assessment to inform shared decision-making about procedural risk. High scores suggest significantly elevated risk of post-procedural delirium, functional decline, and failure to return to baseline. Documenting FRAIL-NH before any acute medical intervention creates a record for family communication, anaesthetic risk stratification, and post-procedure recovery goal setting.
Nursing home administrators, quality officers, health authority auditors
FRAIL-NH scores can be aggregated across a unit or facility to describe the frailty burden of the resident population over time. Rising facility-level frailty scores may reflect changing admission acuity, staffing shortfalls, or inadequate nutritional and rehabilitation programming. Benchmarking FRAIL-NH distributions against comparable facilities supports quality improvement initiatives, resource allocation decisions, and accreditation reporting. Tracking the proportion of residents in each frailty tier (low, intermediate, severe) provides a more nuanced picture of population health than falls or hospitalization rates alone.
Geriatric nurses, physiotherapists, dietitians, occupational therapists
When a resident receives a targeted intervention—nutritional supplementation, a structured exercise program, medication optimization, or a depression treatment—FRAIL-NH provides a validated outcome measure to quantify the functional and clinical response. A 2-point reduction in FRAIL-NH score over 3 months following a rehabilitation program represents meaningful clinical improvement in the institutionalized population. Documenting score changes justifies continuation of therapy, supports funding reviews, and reinforces the interdisciplinary team's investment in rehabilitation for even the oldest and most dependent residents.
FRAIL-NH is specifically calibrated for nursing home and institutional long-term care populations—do not substitute community frailty scales (FRAIL-Scale, CFS, Edmonton Frailty Scale) when assessing institutionalized residents. Community tools underestimate frailty in residents whose baseline dependency would score 'frail' on any community measure, obscuring meaningful differentiation.
Score at consistent time points—admission, 3 months, 6 months—to detect deterioration trajectories. A single-point score provides a snapshot; it is the trajectory over repeated assessments that most reliably predicts hospitalization, decline, and mortality.
A score change of 2 or more points across consecutive assessments represents a clinically meaningful frailty trajectory shift warranting care plan review, family communication, and consideration of goals-of-care discussion.
Pair FRAIL-NH with the Morse Fall Scale for falls risk, MNA Full for nutritional status, and QDRS or CDR for cognitive staging. No single scale captures the full complexity of the nursing home resident—use FRAIL-NH as one component of a comprehensive geriatric assessment framework.
High FRAIL-NH scores (8 and above) should trigger early advance care planning conversation—many severely frail nursing home residents benefit from a structured discussion about goals, preferences, and acceptable interventions before an acute crisis forces these decisions.
Train all staff who administer FRAIL-NH together in a standardized session and conduct inter-rater reliability checks during the first month. Variability in domain scoring between staff members is one of the main sources of unreliable serial tracking.
Individual domain profiles are often more actionable than the total score alone. A resident with a high nutritional domain score and a moderate mobility domain score needs a different intervention profile—dietitian and physiotherapy respectively—than one with high cognitive and low ADL domain scores.
For residents who are immobile or severely cognitively impaired and cannot participate in assessment, use structured clinical observation and nursing documentation to score domains rather than skipping items. Document the assessment method to flag items completed by proxy or observation rather than direct report.
FRAIL-NH was validated by Kaehr et al. (J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2016) in nursing home cohorts and demonstrates strong predictive validity for 12-month mortality, hospitalization, and functional decline in institutionalized older adults. It is specifically calibrated for long-term care settings and is not interchangeable with community frailty scales. The scale is endorsed for serial monitoring and care plan integration in long-term care quality improvement frameworks.
Higher FRAIL-NH totals suggest greater frailty burden and increased need for multidisciplinary long-term-care planning.
Use in nursing-home and long-term-care settings for structured frailty burden assessment and monitoring.
Score structure and cutoffs can differ by implementation source; interpret with local protocol context.
Disclaimer: This tool is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider with questions about your health.
April 21, 2026 · trust-baseline
Clinical trust metadata enabled for this tool page with structured review/version fields.
Assess frailty using the Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS 1–9): Very Fit to Terminally Ill. Used for hospice eligibility, prognostication, ICU triage, surgical risk stratification, and goals-of-care discussions.
OpenGeriatricsScreen frailty using the 5-item FRAIL scale (Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illnesses, Loss of weight).
OpenGeriatricsCalculate deficit-accumulation frailty index from 40 predefined deficits (score 0 to 1).
OpenGeriatricsScreen multidomain frailty using the Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS), a 0-17 style structured assessment.
Open